The project “Deontic Logic in a Pluralistic Framework” aims at improving the formal tools to model inference in deontic logic, by employing general methods offered by non—classical logics. Deontic logics are formal systems which represent reasoning with obligations, permissions and derived notions. Researchers in deontic logic almost unanimously assume classical logic as a background logic. However, it is a longstanding problem in deontic logic that normative conflicts and moral dilemmas are not handled well by classical systems. Granted this, it is not clear that one should abandon altogether classical logic in favour of weaker systems. The project explores a moderate revision of classical deontic logic. The revision is inspired by logical pluralism, according to which different logical theories may coexist in a unitary framework. In particular, a key idea of the project is that of combining classical logic and relevant logic — a specific family of non-classical logics. On the one hand, relevant logic could be used to model weak inference patterns at issue in normative systems. On the other hand, classical logic would continue to model propositional reasoning, i.e. reasoning with non-deontic concepts.