Although the Later Roman Empire (ca. 300-650) was highly stratified, scholars have rarely asked how this impacted on social interactions and what the impact was of ideas of equality on social hierarchies. This project fills this lacuna, by introducing a new method, sources and topics. It combines discourse-analysis of philosophical and theological reflections about hierarchy and equality with an analysis, inspired by practice theory, of a set of social interactions (such as forced penance, insults, and lynch justice). Through this combination, it seeks to chart the meanings of the interactions and how these meanings were exploited by individual actors, for example to invert - albeit momentarily - the hierarchical power relation. The project starts from the hypothesis that the semantics of the action, in the form of moral expectations, allowed the inferior to challenge the superior. In this way, the project challenges traditional top-down views of the Later Roman Empire.